Abstract
Due-dates are often determined during sales negotiations in two stages: (i) in the pre-sale stage, the customer provides a time interval (due-window) of his acceptable due-dates, (ii) in the second stage, the parties agree on the delivery penalties. Thus, the contract reflects penalties of both parts of the sales negotiations: earliness/tardiness penalties of the due-dates (as a function of the deviation from the agreed upon due-window), and earliness/tardiness penalties of the actual delivery times (as a function of the deviation from the due-dates). We model this setting of a two-stage negotiation on a single machine, and reduce the problem to a well-known setting of minimizing the weighted earliness/tardiness with a given (fixed) due-window. We adopt (and correct) a pseudo-polynomial dynamic programming algorithm for this NP-hard problem. The algorithm is extended to a setting of parallel identical machines, verifying that this case remains NP-hard in the ordinary sense. Moreover, an efficient greedy heuristic and a tight lower bound are introduced and tested. Extremely small optimality gaps are obtained in our numerical tests.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1578-1588 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Journal of the Operational Research Society |
| Volume | 66 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Sep 2015 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2015 Operational Research Society Ltd.
Keywords
- due-window assignment
- earliness/tardiness
- lead-time
- scheduling
- single machine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Scheduling with a due-window for acceptable lead-times'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver