TY - JOUR
T1 - Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law
T2 - Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza
AU - EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (EFSA AHAW Panel)
AU - Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
AU - Alvarez, Julio
AU - Bicout, Dominique Joseph
AU - Calistri, Paolo
AU - Depner, Klaus
AU - Drewe, Julian Ashley
AU - Garin-Bastuji, Bruno
AU - Gonzales Rojas, José Luis
AU - Schmidt, Christian Gortázar
AU - Herskin, Mette
AU - Michel, Virginie
AU - Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel
AU - Pasquali, Paolo
AU - Roberts, Helen Clare
AU - Sihvonen, Liisa Helena
AU - Spoolder, Hans
AU - Stahl, Karl
AU - Calvo, Antonio Velarde
AU - Viltrop, Arvo
AU - Winckler, Christoph
AU - De Clercq, Kris
AU - Klement, Eyal
AU - Stegeman, Jan Arend
AU - Gubbins, Simon
AU - Antoniou, Sotiria Eleni
AU - Broglia, Alessandro
AU - Van der Stede, Yves
AU - Zancanaro, Gabriele
AU - Aznar, Inma
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases (‘Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI). In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period and (iii) the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zone, and the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere; nonetheless, specific details of the model used for the assessment of the laboratory sampling procedures for HPAI are presented here. Here, also, the transmission kernels used for the assessment of the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zones are shown. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. In summary, sampling procedures as described in the diagnostic manual for HPAI were considered efficient for gallinaceous poultry, whereas additional sampling is advised for Anseriformes. The monitoring period was assessed as effective, and it was demonstrated that the surveillance zone comprises 95% of the infections from an affected establishment. Recommendations provided for each of the scenarios assessed aim to support the European Commission in the drafting of further pieces of legislation, as well as for plausible ad hoc requests in relation to HPAI.
AB - EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases (‘Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI). In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period and (iii) the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zone, and the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere; nonetheless, specific details of the model used for the assessment of the laboratory sampling procedures for HPAI are presented here. Here, also, the transmission kernels used for the assessment of the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zones are shown. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. In summary, sampling procedures as described in the diagnostic manual for HPAI were considered efficient for gallinaceous poultry, whereas additional sampling is advised for Anseriformes. The monitoring period was assessed as effective, and it was demonstrated that the surveillance zone comprises 95% of the infections from an affected establishment. Recommendations provided for each of the scenarios assessed aim to support the European Commission in the drafting of further pieces of legislation, as well as for plausible ad hoc requests in relation to HPAI.
KW - Avian Influenza
KW - Control measures
KW - HPAI
KW - monitoring period
KW - protection zone
KW - sampling procedures
KW - surveillance zone
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100101238&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6372
DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6372
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85100101238
SN - 1831-4732
VL - 19
JO - EFSA Journal
JF - EFSA Journal
IS - 1
M1 - e06372
ER -