Abstract
The media salience trends of 40 events in the UK between 1984 and 2003 were examined to determine the validity of allegations regarding the agenda-setting effect of appointing public inquiries. Results show that, contrary to the 'long grass' argument, the attenuation in media salience following the appointment of a public inquiry is not different from that of non-inquired events.The findings are analysed and an alternative explanation is suggested for the prevalence of the 'long grass' argument.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 629-650 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Policy and Politics |
Volume | 35 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 2007 |
Keywords
- Agenda setting
- Longitudinal analysis
- Media salience