TY - JOUR
T1 - Searching for an anchor in an unpredictable world
T2 - A computational model of obsessive compulsive disorder.
AU - Fradkin, Isaac
AU - Adams, Rick A.
AU - Parr, Thomas
AU - Roiser, Jonathan P.
AU - Huppert, Jonathan D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Psychological Association
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - In this article, we develop a computational model of obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). We propose that OCD is characterized by a difficulty in relying on past events to predict the consequences of patients’ own actions and the unfolding of possible events. Clinically, this corresponds both to patients’ difficulty in trusting their own actions (and therefore repeating them), and to their common preoccupation with unlikely chains of events. Critically, we develop this idea on the basis of the well-developed framework of the Bayesian brain, where this impairment is formalized as excessive uncertainty regarding state transitions. We illustrate the validity of this idea using quantitative simulations and use these to form specific empirical predictions. These predictions are evaluated in relation to existing evidence, and are used to delineate directions for future research. We show how seemingly unrelated findings and phenomena in OCD can be explained by the model, including a persistent experience that actions were not adequately performed and a tendency to repeat actions; excessive information gathering (i.e., checking); indecisiveness and pathological doubt; overreliance on habits at the expense of goal-directed behavior; and overresponsiveness to sensory stimuli, thoughts, and feedback. We discuss the relationship and interaction between our model and other prominent models of OCD, including models focusing on harm-avoidance, not-just-right experiences, or impairments in goal-directed behavior. Finally, we outline potential clinical implications and suggest lines for future research.
AB - In this article, we develop a computational model of obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). We propose that OCD is characterized by a difficulty in relying on past events to predict the consequences of patients’ own actions and the unfolding of possible events. Clinically, this corresponds both to patients’ difficulty in trusting their own actions (and therefore repeating them), and to their common preoccupation with unlikely chains of events. Critically, we develop this idea on the basis of the well-developed framework of the Bayesian brain, where this impairment is formalized as excessive uncertainty regarding state transitions. We illustrate the validity of this idea using quantitative simulations and use these to form specific empirical predictions. These predictions are evaluated in relation to existing evidence, and are used to delineate directions for future research. We show how seemingly unrelated findings and phenomena in OCD can be explained by the model, including a persistent experience that actions were not adequately performed and a tendency to repeat actions; excessive information gathering (i.e., checking); indecisiveness and pathological doubt; overreliance on habits at the expense of goal-directed behavior; and overresponsiveness to sensory stimuli, thoughts, and feedback. We discuss the relationship and interaction between our model and other prominent models of OCD, including models focusing on harm-avoidance, not-just-right experiences, or impairments in goal-directed behavior. Finally, we outline potential clinical implications and suggest lines for future research.
KW - Bayesian brain
KW - active inference
KW - computational psychiatry
KW - habits
KW - obsessive–compulsive disorder
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85080886341&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/rev0000188
DO - 10.1037/rev0000188
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 32105115
AN - SCOPUS:85080886341
SN - 0033-295X
JO - Psychological Review
JF - Psychological Review
ER -