TY - JOUR
T1 - Selective genotyping with a main trait and a correlated trait
AU - Medugorac, I.
AU - Soller, M.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - In some instances of quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping, a correlated trait may be available for which measurement is less costly or more convenient than direct measurement of the trait of main interest. In this paper we consider ways of combining phenotyping for a main trait and a correlated trait to maximize power within the overall framework of a selective genotyping design. Four schemes are compared: (1) Selection for the main trait only (2) Selection for the correlated trait only (3) Two-stage selection (4) Three-stage selection. Optimum proportion selected for the two traits were obtained for the various schemes, and power parameters compared, according to the correlation r, between the two traits, and the proportion of the population, Q, phenotyped for the main trait. The schemes were compared under two sets of assumptions: (1) Total population size and proportion that can be phenotyped for the main trait are fixed, and (2) Total costs are fixed, with relative cost, c′, of rearing and phenotyping for the correlated trait as compared to the main trait. Under (1), the multi-stage schemes are very advantageous when r is high, and Q is low. Under (2), the single-stage schemes were always superior to the multi-stage schemes; Scheme 1 being preferred when r2/c′ < 1.0, and Scheme 2 when r2/c′ > 1.0.
AB - In some instances of quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping, a correlated trait may be available for which measurement is less costly or more convenient than direct measurement of the trait of main interest. In this paper we consider ways of combining phenotyping for a main trait and a correlated trait to maximize power within the overall framework of a selective genotyping design. Four schemes are compared: (1) Selection for the main trait only (2) Selection for the correlated trait only (3) Two-stage selection (4) Three-stage selection. Optimum proportion selected for the two traits were obtained for the various schemes, and power parameters compared, according to the correlation r, between the two traits, and the proportion of the population, Q, phenotyped for the main trait. The schemes were compared under two sets of assumptions: (1) Total population size and proportion that can be phenotyped for the main trait are fixed, and (2) Total costs are fixed, with relative cost, c′, of rearing and phenotyping for the correlated trait as compared to the main trait. Under (1), the multi-stage schemes are very advantageous when r is high, and Q is low. Under (2), the single-stage schemes were always superior to the multi-stage schemes; Scheme 1 being preferred when r2/c′ < 1.0, and Scheme 2 when r2/c′ > 1.0.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0035642458
U2 - 10.1046/j.1439-0388.2001.00308.x
DO - 10.1046/j.1439-0388.2001.00308.x
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:0035642458
SN - 0931-2668
VL - 118
SP - 285
EP - 295
JO - Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics
JF - Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics
IS - 5
ER -