Self-repeat as a multimodal retraction practice: Evidence from Hebrew conversation

Leon Shor*, Michal Marmorstein

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

The paper focuses on a particular practice of self-repeat through which participants retract their prior formulations, and explores its multimodal design and use in the dynamic construction of meaning in Hebrew conversation. Drawing on interactional approaches to language and embodied action, we show that the practice of self-repeat is used to retract a formulation judged by its producer as being inadequate and ill-calibrated in the given interactional context. This function is supported by the multimodal configuration in which the lexical repeat is cast, which involves a stable prosodic component and a variable embodied component. Through its prosodic and embodied design, the repeat is contextualized as a noticeable display of accountability for having made an ill-suited choice of words. While the self-repeat alone is sufficient in proposing a problem of calibration, it can also be followed by a lexical replacement, which makes explicit the adjusted or recalibrated term. The self-repeat practice shows how participants engage in semantic work through online and situated revision of their formulations. This exposed process of meaning construction reveals their understanding of the constitutive link between the conceptual and the normative orders as practiced in actual conversation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)132-166
Number of pages35
JournalInteractional Linguistics
Volume3
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - 31 Dec 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Keywords

  • embodied action
  • interactional semantics
  • multi-modality
  • regrading
  • retraction
  • self-repeat
  • spoken Hebrew

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Self-repeat as a multimodal retraction practice: Evidence from Hebrew conversation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this