TY - JOUR
T1 - Selling multiple correlated goods
T2 - Revenue maximization and menu-size complexity
AU - Hart, Sergiu
AU - Nisan, Noam
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2019/9
Y1 - 2019/9
N2 - We consider the menu size of mechanisms as a measure of their complexity, and study how it relates to revenue extraction capabilities. Our setting has a single revenue-maximizing seller selling a number of goods to a single buyer whose private values for the goods are drawn from a possibly correlated known distribution, and whose valuation is additive over the goods. We show that when there are two (or more) goods, simple mechanisms of bounded menu size—such as selling the goods separately, or as a bundle, or deterministically—may yield only a negligible fraction of the optimal revenue. We show that the revenue increases at most linearly in menu size, and exhibit valuations for which it increases at least as a fixed fractional power of menu size. For deterministic mechanisms, their revenue is shown to be comparable to the revenue achievable by mechanisms with a similar menu size (which is exponential in the number of goods). Thus, it is the number of possible outcomes (i.e., the menu size) rather than restrictions on allocations (e.g., being deterministic) that stands out as the critical limitation for revenue extraction.
AB - We consider the menu size of mechanisms as a measure of their complexity, and study how it relates to revenue extraction capabilities. Our setting has a single revenue-maximizing seller selling a number of goods to a single buyer whose private values for the goods are drawn from a possibly correlated known distribution, and whose valuation is additive over the goods. We show that when there are two (or more) goods, simple mechanisms of bounded menu size—such as selling the goods separately, or as a bundle, or deterministically—may yield only a negligible fraction of the optimal revenue. We show that the revenue increases at most linearly in menu size, and exhibit valuations for which it increases at least as a fixed fractional power of menu size. For deterministic mechanisms, their revenue is shown to be comparable to the revenue achievable by mechanisms with a similar menu size (which is exponential in the number of goods). Thus, it is the number of possible outcomes (i.e., the menu size) rather than restrictions on allocations (e.g., being deterministic) that stands out as the critical limitation for revenue extraction.
KW - Auctions
KW - Complexity
KW - Correlated goods
KW - Mechanism design
KW - Menu size
KW - Monopolistic pricing
KW - Multiple goods
KW - Simple mechanisms
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070656216&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jet.2019.07.006
DO - 10.1016/j.jet.2019.07.006
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85070656216
SN - 0022-0531
VL - 183
SP - 991
EP - 1029
JO - Journal of Economic Theory
JF - Journal of Economic Theory
ER -