Sensitivity of posterior parameter correlations and response parameter correlations to prior response uncertainty

J. J. Wagschal*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

The two parameters one response model of the generalized linear least squares parameter adjustment methodology was used in order to analyze the procedure of improving cross sections agreement with integral experimental results. Two extreme adjustment cases were considered. One case is using extremely accurate measured integral responses, such as keir of Godiva or Jezebel for instance. The other one is modifying only one parameter, for instance the modification of v- in ENDF/B-VII, in order to improve agreement of calculated responses with corresponding integral measurements results. In both cases new posterior parameters correlations are generated. The conclusion is that it is not advised to use integral measurements information in the evaluation process of a general purpose nuclear data file.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationInternational Conference on the Physics of Reactors 2012, PHYSOR 2012
Subtitle of host publicationAdvances in Reactor Physics
Pages4127-4135
Number of pages9
StatePublished - 2012
EventInternational Conference on the Physics of Reactors 2012: Advances in Reactor Physics, PHYSOR 2012 - Knoxville, TN, United States
Duration: 15 Apr 201220 Apr 2012

Publication series

NameInternational Conference on the Physics of Reactors 2012, PHYSOR 2012: Advances in Reactor Physics
Volume5

Conference

ConferenceInternational Conference on the Physics of Reactors 2012: Advances in Reactor Physics, PHYSOR 2012
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityKnoxville, TN
Period15/04/1220/04/12

Keywords

  • Adjustment
  • Correlations
  • Cross section evaluation
  • Integral experiments

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sensitivity of posterior parameter correlations and response parameter correlations to prior response uncertainty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this