Tort law contains multiple doctrines governing the assignment of liability and the calculation of damages. But in what sequence should courts apply these doctrines? Does it matter, for example, whether a court applies comparative fault before or after mitigation of damages? The answer, rather surprisingly, is that sequencing does matter, and it can substantially affect the compensation that a tort victim ultimately receives. Yet the existing case law on sequencing is ad hoc, inconsistent, and undertheorized, and the issue has been entirely overlooked by the academic literature.
|Original language||American English|
|Number of pages||32|
|Journal||Stanford Law Review|
|State||Published - 2022|
Bibliographical notePublisher Copyright:
© 2022, Stanford Law School. All rights reserved.