Servants of two (or more) masters: Accounting for the complexity of intraparty candidate selection methods

Or Tuttnauer*, Gideon Rahat

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Intraparty candidate selection methods are the drivers of many topics of interest to political scientists. Their operationalization, however, is made complicated because they tend to involve multiple selectorates that differ in their levels of inclusiveness and centralization and that play various roles within the process. This complexity poses a challenge for large-n comparative studies. Drawing on the Political Parties DataBase Round Two to analyze candidate selection methods in 184 parties from 35 democracies, we highlight the inadequacy of the currently available measures to correctly account for this complexity in large-n studies and offer improvements on this front. Specifically, we propose a continuous measure of inclusiveness that better captures the complexity of candidate selection methods and a new measure of complexity to facilitate future analyses into this feature. We recommend that scholars in other cross-national projects consider adopting similar or improved coding strategies in order to better capture these complexities.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)185-192
Number of pages8
JournalParty Politics
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022.

Keywords

  • candidate selection
  • intra-party democracy
  • party data
  • political parties

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Servants of two (or more) masters: Accounting for the complexity of intraparty candidate selection methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this