Abstract
We prove that if a closed planar set S is not a countable union of convex subsets, then exactly one of the following holds: (a) There is a perfect subset P⊆S such that for every pair of distinct points x, yεP, the convex closure of x, y is not contained in S. (b) (a) does not hold and there is a perfect subset P⊆S such that for every pair of points x, yεP the convex closure of {x, y} is contained in S, but for every triple of distinct points x, y, zεP the convex closure of {x, y, z} is not contained in S. We show that an analogous theorem is impossible for dimension greater than 2. We give an example of a compact planar set with countable degree of visual independence which is not a countable union of convex subsets, and give a combinatorial criterion for a closed set in R d not to be a countable union of convex sets. We also prove a conjecture of G. Kalai, namely, that a closed planar set with the property that each of its visually independent subsets has at most one accumulation point, is a countable union of convex sets. We also give examples of sets which possess a (small) finite degree of visual independence which are not a countable union of convex subsets.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 313-342 |
| Number of pages | 30 |
| Journal | Israel Journal of Mathematics |
| Volume | 70 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 1990 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Sets in a euclidean space which are not a countable union of convex subsets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver