Silynes (RC≡SiR′) and disilynes (RSi≡SiR′): Why are less bonds worth energetically more?

David Danovich, Franois Ogliaro, Miriam Karni, Yitzhak Apeloig*, David L. Cooper, Sason Shaik

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

65 Scopus citations

Abstract

Bond stabilization through bending! Valence bond analysis shows that the σ frames of 1-3 (1: E = Si, E′ = C; 2: E = E′ = Si; 3: E = E′ = C) are stabilized by trans bending (B), while π bonding is weakened. In acetylene (3) π bonding overrides the σ frame and establishes a linear molecule (3L). In contrast, the σ frames dominate in silyne (1) and disilyne (2) and lead to trans-bent structures (1B and 2B).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4023-4026
Number of pages4
JournalAngewandte Chemie - International Edition
Volume40
Issue number21
DOIs
StatePublished - 5 Nov 2001

Keywords

  • Bond theory
  • Multiple bonds
  • Silicon
  • Valence bond calculations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Silynes (RC≡SiR′) and disilynes (RSi≡SiR′): Why are less bonds worth energetically more?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this