Small area estimation under a two-part random effects model with application to estimation of literacy in developing countries

Danny Pfeffermann*, Bénédicte Terryn, Fernando A.S. Moura

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper considers situations where the target response value is either zero or an observation from a continuous distribution. A typical example analyzed in the paper is the assessment of literacy proficiency with the possible outcome being either zero, indicating illiteracy, or a positive score measuring the level of literacy. Our interest is in how to obtain valid estimates of the average response, or the proportion of positive responses in small areas, for which only small samples or no samples are available. As in other small area estimation problems, the small sample sizes in at least some of the sampled areas and/or the existence of nonsampled areas requires the use of model based methods. Available methods, however, are not suitable for this kind of data because of the mixed distribution of the responses, having a large peak at zero, juxtaposed to a continuous distribution for the rest of the responses. We develop, therefore, a suitable two-part random effects model and show how to fit the model and assess its goodness of fit, and how to compute the small area estimators of interest and measure their precision. The proposed method is illustrated using simulated data and data obtained from a literacy survey conducted in Cambodia.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)235-249
Number of pages15
JournalSurvey Methodology
Volume34
Issue number2
StatePublished - 23 Dec 2008

Keywords

  • Credibility intervals
  • Generalized linear mixed model
  • Goodness of fit
  • Linear mixed model
  • MCMC
  • Prediction bias
  • Prediction MSE

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Small area estimation under a two-part random effects model with application to estimation of literacy in developing countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this