Abstract
This paper presents a new data set on constitutional commitments to social rights (CCSR) for 68 countries. Quantitative indices are constructed for five social rights: the right to social security, education, health, housing and workers rights. We find two clear groups classified by legal origins: countries which share the tradition of French civil law generally have a higher CCSR than those that share the tradition of English common law. The CCSR in socialist countries is closer to French civil law, whereas countries with a German or Scandinavian tradition resemble the English common law countries more closely. Then the paper addresses the following question: is the constitution a binding constraint on public policy? We have not found a robust effect of CCSR on public policy except for the constitutional right to social security. Journal of Comparative Economics 36 (1) (2008) 103-119.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 103-119 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Journal of Comparative Economics |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2008 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- Constitution
- Democracy
- Government expenditure
- Legal origins
- Social rights
- Social security
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Social rights in the constitution and in practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver