Social support and prosocial decisions in times of distress: Helping a single recipient versus multiple recipients

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study examined the link between perceived social support and prosocial behavior during a period of collective crisis, focusing on decisions to help either a single or multiple recipients. Two studies were conducted—one with adolescents (Study 1, N = 192) and one with university students (Study 2, N = 196). Participants first reported their perceived social support and recent volunteering activities during the crisis. A week later, they were randomly assigned to one of two between-subjects conditions, in which they were asked about their willingness to help either a single student or multiple students experiencing the same need. Results showed a significant singularity effect in both groups: participants were more willing to help a single recipient than multiple ones. Among adolescents, higher perceived social support was consistently associated with greater volunteering and willingness to help, regardless of the recipient. Among adults, social support attenuated the singularity effect, such that participants who perceived higher levels of social support during the crisis were less affected by the recipient's singularity in their helping decisions. These findings highlight the role of social support in promoting prosocial behavior and mitigating biases in helping decisions during times of collective distress, with distinct patterns across developmental stages.

Original languageEnglish
Article number113738
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume256
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Authors.

Keywords

  • Collective crisis
  • Helping behavior
  • Prosocial decisions
  • Singularity effect
  • Social support
  • Volunteering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Social support and prosocial decisions in times of distress: Helping a single recipient versus multiple recipients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this