Abstract
This article reexamines the relationship between the two accounts of the Gibeon Theophany (1 Kgs 3,4-15; 2 Chr 1,1-13). Recently, a growing number of scholars claim that the Chronicler used a different Vorlage, be that a lost source shared with Kings or a different version of the latter, with little to no Deuteronomistic elements. The current study proposes a novel approach to the problem, integrating literary and textual criteria and expanding the discussion to include other related texts in the Solomon narrative in Kings and Chronicles.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 329-349 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Biblica |
| Volume | 104 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023 Peeters Publishers. All rights reserved.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'SOLOMON AT GIBEON (1 KGS 3,4-15; 2 CHR 1,2-13): WHAT WAS THE CHRONICLER’S SOURCE?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver