Spontaneous causal inferences

Ran R. Hassin; John A. Bargh; James S. Uleman

doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00016-1

Spontaneous causal inferences

Ran R. Hassin^*
, John A. Bargh
, James S. Uleman

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

71 Scopus citations

Abstract

Three studies examine the hypothesis that people spontaneously (i.e., unintentionally and without awareness of doing so) infer causes (the Spontaneous Causal Inference, or SCI, hypothesis). Using a cued-recall paradigm, Study 1 examines whether SCIs occur and Study 2 allows for a comparison between implicitly inferred and explicitly mentioned causes. Study 3 examines whether SCIs can be fully explained in terms of spreading activation to general, abstract schemes. It is suggested that STIs (e.g., Winter & Uleman, 1984), and spontaneous predicting inferences (e.g., McKoon & Ratclif, 1986a, 1986b), may be better understood in their relation to SCIs.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	515-522
Number of pages	8
Journal	Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume	38
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00016-1
State	Published - Sep 2002
Externally published	Yes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This research was partly supported by a Fulbright post-doctoral grant to Hassin and by a Public Health Service Grant R01-MH60767 to Bargh.

Access to Document

10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00016-1

Cite this

@article{ee040fb0b69446ecafb6280a39e4b913,

title = "Spontaneous causal inferences",

abstract = "Three studies examine the hypothesis that people spontaneously (i.e., unintentionally and without awareness of doing so) infer causes (the Spontaneous Causal Inference, or SCI, hypothesis). Using a cued-recall paradigm, Study 1 examines whether SCIs occur and Study 2 allows for a comparison between implicitly inferred and explicitly mentioned causes. Study 3 examines whether SCIs can be fully explained in terms of spreading activation to general, abstract schemes. It is suggested that STIs (e.g., Winter \& Uleman, 1984), and spontaneous predicting inferences (e.g., McKoon \& Ratclif, 1986a, 1986b), may be better understood in their relation to SCIs.",

author = "Hassin, \{Ran R.\} and Bargh, \{John A.\} and Uleman, \{James S.\}",

note = "Funding Information: This research was partly supported by a Fulbright post-doctoral grant to Hassin and by a Public Health Service Grant R01-MH60767 to Bargh. ",

year = "2002",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00016-1",

language = "אנגלית",

volume = "38",

pages = "515--522",

journal = "Journal of Experimental Social Psychology",

issn = "0022-1031",

publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spontaneous causal inferences

AU - Hassin, Ran R.

AU - Bargh, John A.

AU - Uleman, James S.

N1 - Funding Information: This research was partly supported by a Fulbright post-doctoral grant to Hassin and by a Public Health Service Grant R01-MH60767 to Bargh.

PY - 2002/9

Y1 - 2002/9

N2 - Three studies examine the hypothesis that people spontaneously (i.e., unintentionally and without awareness of doing so) infer causes (the Spontaneous Causal Inference, or SCI, hypothesis). Using a cued-recall paradigm, Study 1 examines whether SCIs occur and Study 2 allows for a comparison between implicitly inferred and explicitly mentioned causes. Study 3 examines whether SCIs can be fully explained in terms of spreading activation to general, abstract schemes. It is suggested that STIs (e.g., Winter & Uleman, 1984), and spontaneous predicting inferences (e.g., McKoon & Ratclif, 1986a, 1986b), may be better understood in their relation to SCIs.

AB - Three studies examine the hypothesis that people spontaneously (i.e., unintentionally and without awareness of doing so) infer causes (the Spontaneous Causal Inference, or SCI, hypothesis). Using a cued-recall paradigm, Study 1 examines whether SCIs occur and Study 2 allows for a comparison between implicitly inferred and explicitly mentioned causes. Study 3 examines whether SCIs can be fully explained in terms of spreading activation to general, abstract schemes. It is suggested that STIs (e.g., Winter & Uleman, 1984), and spontaneous predicting inferences (e.g., McKoon & Ratclif, 1986a, 1986b), may be better understood in their relation to SCIs.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0036751336

U2 - 10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00016-1

DO - 10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00016-1

M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???

AN - SCOPUS:0036751336

SN - 0022-1031

VL - 38

SP - 515

EP - 522

JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

IS - 5

ER -

Spontaneous causal inferences

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this