Status-quo and omission biases

Ilana Ritov*, Jonathan Baron

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

325 Scopus citations

Abstract

Bias toward the status quo, found in choice and in emotional reactions to adverse outcomes, has been confounded with bias toward omission. We unconfounded these effects with scenarios in which change occurs unless action is taken. Subjects reacted more strongly to adverse outcomes caused by action, whether the status quo was maintained or not, and subjects preferred inaction over action even when inaction was associated with change. No status-quo bias was found in a matching task, which did not require action. The observed status-quo bias is at least partly caused by a bias toward omissions.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)49-61
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Risk and Uncertainty
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1992
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • decision making
  • omission
  • status quo

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Status-quo and omission biases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this