Abstract
This article develops an asset allocation framework that incorporates prior beliefs about the extent of stock return predictability explained by asset pricing models. We find that when prior beliefs allow even minor deviations from pricing model implications, the resulting asset allocations depart considerably from and substantially out-perform allocations dictated by either the underlying models or the sample evidence on return predictability. Under a wide range of beliefs about model pricing abilities, asset allocations based on conditional models outperform their unconditional counterparts that exclude return predictability.
Original language | American English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 699-738 |
Number of pages | 40 |
Journal | Review of Financial Studies |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 2004 |
Externally published | Yes |