Abstract
We use Bayesian model averaging to analyze the sample evidence on return predictability in the presence of model uncertainty. The analysis reveals in-sample and out-of-sample predictability, and shows that the out-of-sample performance of the Bayesian approach is superior to that of model selection criteria. We find that term and market premia are robust predictors. Moreover, small-cap value stocks appear more predictable than large-cap growth stocks. We also investigate the implications of model uncertainty from investment management perspectives. We show that model uncertainty is more important than estimation risk, and investors who discard model uncertainty face large utility losses.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 423-458 |
Number of pages | 36 |
Journal | Journal of Financial Economics |
Volume | 64 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2002 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Bayesian model averaging
- Model uncertainty
- Portfolio selection
- Stock return predictability
- Variance decomposition