Given that causative linguistic constructions are divisible into three parts: i) a cause (c); ii) an effect (e); and iii) the dependency (D) between (c) and (e), in studying the nature of (D), one should examine whether one, all-encompassing, causative meaning component underlying the diverse linguistic phenomena is a justifiable position, or rather different ones should be distinguished for the various causative constructions. Only recently several philosophers argued in favor of theories of causal pluralism, allowing the co-existence of different notions of causation. Some cognitive studies also indicate that people have a pluralistic conception of causation; similarly it has been proposed that the semantic content of (D) is different in various constructions, tracing whether the main verb encodes a necessary or a sufficient condition. This paper expands on this latter line of thought by focusing on the types of dependencies encoded within three verbal constructions in Hebrew, considering crucially whether these dependencies are asserted and/or presupposed. It argues, therefore, in favor of a non-unified semantic analysis for (D) denoted by the three verbal causative constructions to be passed under review here: overt causatives, verbs of change of state, and caused activity verbs. According to the current proposal: overt causatives assert necessary conditions; change of state causatives assert necessary conditions and presuppose potential sufficient conditions; and caused activities only presuppose potential sufficient conditions.
|Title of host publication||Proceedings of the 36th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics|
|Editors||Richard Stockwell, Maura O'Leary, Zhongshi Xu, Z.L. Zhou|
|Publisher||Cascadilla Proceedings Project|
|Number of pages||6|
|State||Published - 2019|