TY - JOUR
T1 - Superexchange‐Assisted Through‐Bridge Electron Transfer
T2 - Electronic and Dynamical Aspects
AU - Kosloff, Ronnie
AU - Ratner, Mark A.
PY - 1990
Y1 - 1990
N2 - The effects of electronic structure on bridge‐assisted electron transfer are considered. Using static perturbation theory, time‐dependent perturbation theory, and direct time‐dependent dynamics within generalized tight binding models, we examine the role of energy gaps, relative energetics of donor and acceptor orbitals with hole‐type and electron‐type superexchange sites, damping and dephasing, and overall energetics in electron transfer. We find that a generalization of the simple McConnell relationship to nonresonant transfer can in fact be made, but that no simple formula describes all limits; this is important in applications to a number of systems, including photosynthetic reaction centers, in which such superexchange occurs. The dynamical studies indicate some important and unexpected phenomena: these include quantum interferences between different pathways, recurrences and oscillations, and competitive effects of hole‐type and electron‐type superexchange. We suggest that direct dynamical study, as has begun to appear from several laboratories, provides an excellent way to visualize the intermediate state contributions to intramolecular electron transfer processes.
AB - The effects of electronic structure on bridge‐assisted electron transfer are considered. Using static perturbation theory, time‐dependent perturbation theory, and direct time‐dependent dynamics within generalized tight binding models, we examine the role of energy gaps, relative energetics of donor and acceptor orbitals with hole‐type and electron‐type superexchange sites, damping and dephasing, and overall energetics in electron transfer. We find that a generalization of the simple McConnell relationship to nonresonant transfer can in fact be made, but that no simple formula describes all limits; this is important in applications to a number of systems, including photosynthetic reaction centers, in which such superexchange occurs. The dynamical studies indicate some important and unexpected phenomena: these include quantum interferences between different pathways, recurrences and oscillations, and competitive effects of hole‐type and electron‐type superexchange. We suggest that direct dynamical study, as has begun to appear from several laboratories, provides an excellent way to visualize the intermediate state contributions to intramolecular electron transfer processes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85005536928&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ijch.199000006
DO - 10.1002/ijch.199000006
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85005536928
SN - 0021-2148
VL - 30
SP - 45
EP - 58
JO - Israel Journal of Chemistry
JF - Israel Journal of Chemistry
IS - 1-2
ER -