Abstract
This article presents a conceptual modelfor assessing trainer interventions. Among the interventions made by trainers in two self-study groups, those judged as having contributed most to what group members learned were analyzed, yielding an 18-cluster system for categorizing trainers’ teaching acts. These clusters were grouped into several conceptual dimensions: Authority, Responsibility, and Power; Anxiety and Resistance; Personal and Interpersonal Issues; and Trainer as Teacher. All trainer interventions made in these two groups were recoded according to the 18-cluster system, and subsequent analyses examined trainer-member agreement, contributions to learning by cluster and dimension, and the impact of the intervention's level of complexity. The results show that group members learn best when provided with a theoretical framework and concepts to make meaning of their experiences in the group and when they are taught how to use their inner lives to provide information about that experience.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 187-203 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Small Group Research |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 1984 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Teaching and learning in small groups: An Analysis of Trainer Interventions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver