Abstract
Should lecturers who teach political philosophy hide their personal political beliefs? This question becomes interesting when lecturers face what seems to be morally repugnant policies, such as massive human rights violations. In such cases is there a conflict between a lecturer's civic and political obligations and his/her academic and pedagogical ones? This article argues that while university lecturers should not adhere to academic neutrality, they should be impartial. While arguing this a distinction is drawn between paternalism and empowerment through teaching.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 97-120 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Theory and Research in Education |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2005 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- academic neutrality
- empowerment
- impartiality
- objectivity
- political philosophy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Teaching political philosophy and academic neutrality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver