Abstract
Hoerl & McCormack argue that comparative and developmental psychology teaches us that "neither animals nor infants can think and reason about time." We argue that the authors neglect to take into account pivotal evidence from ethology that suggests that non-human animals do possess a capacity to represent and reason about time, namely, work done on Sumatran orangutans' long travel calls.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | e257 |
| Journal | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
| Volume | 42 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - 12 Dec 2019 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019 Cambridge University Press.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Temporal representation and reasoning in non-human animals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver