Abstract
This metaanalysis has some important general implications for conducting studies to evaluate other treatments as well as for patient management. To avoid missing clinically important differences (eg, 15-20% differences in mortality at 5 years) between the methods of revascularization, study populations should be several times larger than those in our metaanalysis, should include a high proportion of the types of patients for whom surgery is known to be superior to medical therapy, and should be complemented by a systematic overview. We recommend that researchers running large randomized trials consider prospective collaboration with researchers from other trials with a common protocol.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | [3987 words; 31 paragraphs] |
| Journal | The Online journal of current clinical trials |
| Volume | Doc No 144 |
| State | Published - 15 Oct 1994 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ten-year results of the randomized control trials of coronary artery bypass graft surgery: tabular data compiled by the collaborative effort of the original trial investigators. Part 2 of 2.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver