Abstract
We analyze test design and certification standards when an uninformed seller has the option to generate and disclose costly information regarding asset quality. We characterize equilibria by a minimum principle: the test and disclosure policy are chosen to minimize the asset's value conditional on nondisclosure. Thus, when sellers choose the information provided, simple pass/fail certification tests are likely to dominate the market. A social planner could raise informational and allocative efficiency, and lower deadweight testing costs, by raising the certification standard. Monopolist certifiers also satisfy the minimum principle but set a higher standard and reduce testing rates to maximize revenue.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2173-2207 |
| Number of pages | 35 |
| Journal | American Economic Review |
| Volume | 109 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 2019 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019 American Economic Association. All rights reserved.