Testing measurement invariance using multigroup CFA: Differences between educational groups in human values measurement

Holger Steinmetz*, Peter Schmidt, Andrea Tina-Booh, Siegrid Wieczorek, Shalom H. Schwartz

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

249 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article applies the testing procedures for measurement invariance using multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA). It illustrates these procedures by investigating the factorial structure and invariance of the Portraits Value Questionnaire (PVQ, Schwartz et al.: J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 32(5), 519-542 (2001)) across three education groups in a population sample (N = 1,677). The PVQ measures 10 basic values that Schwartz postulates to comprehensively describe the human values recognized in all societies (achievement, hedonism, self-direction, benevolence, conformity, security, stimulation, power, tradition and universalism). We also estimate and compare the latent means of the three education groups. The analyses show partial invariance for most of the 10 values and parameters. As expected, the latent means show that less educated respondents attribute more importance to security, tradition, and conformity values.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)599-616
Number of pages18
JournalQuality and Quantity
Volume43
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2009

Keywords

  • Cross-cultural psychology
  • Education
  • Measurement invariance
  • Multigroup analyses
  • Survey
  • Values

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Testing measurement invariance using multigroup CFA: Differences between educational groups in human values measurement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this