TY - JOUR
T1 - The Σ2-Potentialist Principle
AU - Ben Neria, Omer
AU - Goldberg, Gabriel
AU - Kaplan, Eyal
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025
PY - 2025/5
Y1 - 2025/5
N2 - We settle a question of Woodin motivated by the philosophy of potentialism in set theory. A sentence in the language of set theory is locally verifiable if it asserts the existence of a level Vα of the cumulative hierarchy of sets with some first-order property; this is equivalent to being Σ2 in the Lévy hierarchy. A sentence is Vα-satisfiable if it can be forced without changing Vα, and V-satisfiable if it is Vα-satisfiable for all ordinals α. The Σ2-Potentialist Principle, introduced by Woodin, asserts that every V-satisfiable locally verifiable sentence is true. We show in Theorem 6.2 that the Σ2-Potentialist Principle is consistent relative to a supercompact cardinal. We accomplish this by generalizing Gitik's method of iterating distributive forcings by embedding them into Príkry-type forcings [6, Section 6.4]; our generalization, Theorem 5.2, works for forcings that add no bounded subsets to a strongly compact cardinal, which requires a completely different proof. Finally, using the concept of mutual stationarity, we show in Theorem 7.5 that the Σ2-Potentialist Principle implies the consistency of a Woodin cardinal.3
AB - We settle a question of Woodin motivated by the philosophy of potentialism in set theory. A sentence in the language of set theory is locally verifiable if it asserts the existence of a level Vα of the cumulative hierarchy of sets with some first-order property; this is equivalent to being Σ2 in the Lévy hierarchy. A sentence is Vα-satisfiable if it can be forced without changing Vα, and V-satisfiable if it is Vα-satisfiable for all ordinals α. The Σ2-Potentialist Principle, introduced by Woodin, asserts that every V-satisfiable locally verifiable sentence is true. We show in Theorem 6.2 that the Σ2-Potentialist Principle is consistent relative to a supercompact cardinal. We accomplish this by generalizing Gitik's method of iterating distributive forcings by embedding them into Príkry-type forcings [6, Section 6.4]; our generalization, Theorem 5.2, works for forcings that add no bounded subsets to a strongly compact cardinal, which requires a completely different proof. Finally, using the concept of mutual stationarity, we show in Theorem 7.5 that the Σ2-Potentialist Principle implies the consistency of a Woodin cardinal.3
KW - Forcing
KW - Large cardinals
KW - Maximality principles
KW - Potentialism
KW - Prikry forcing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85218897287&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.aim.2025.110182
DO - 10.1016/j.aim.2025.110182
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85218897287
SN - 0001-8708
VL - 467
JO - Advances in Mathematics
JF - Advances in Mathematics
M1 - 110182
ER -