The argument for (Living) originalism: Comments on Jack Balkin's theory of constitutional interpretation

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

1 Scopus citations

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	35-41
Number of pages	7
Journal	Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies
Volume	7
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/jrls/jlt004
State	Published - 1 Jun 2013

Access to Document

@article{d580368cdba84f23bfe5bf85483fa815,

title = "The argument for (Living) originalism: Comments on Jack Balkin's theory of constitutional interpretation",

author = "Re'em Segev",

year = "2013",

month = jun,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1093/jrls/jlt004",

language = "אנגלית",

volume = "7",

pages = "35--41",

journal = "Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies",

issn = "2219-7117",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The argument for (Living) originalism

T2 - Comments on Jack Balkin's theory of constitutional interpretation

AU - Segev, Re'em

PY - 2013/6/1

Y1 - 2013/6/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071121742&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jrls/jlt004

DO - 10.1093/jrls/jlt004

M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.comment???

AN - SCOPUS:85071121742

SN - 2219-7117

VL - 7

SP - 35

EP - 41

JO - Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies

JF - Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies

IS - 1

ER -