Abstract
The 2010 British election resulted in what the British refer to as a " hung Parliament" for the first time in over a generation. This result further heightened the debate over the fairness and utility of the nation's centuries-old first-past-the-post (FPTP) system. Survey data are used to simulate the election outcome under four different electoral systems beyond FPTP: round-robin pair-wise comparisons, the Borda count, the alternative vote, and Coombs' method. Results suggest that in 2010, the Liberal-Democrats were Condorcet preferred to all other parties and would have won a national election under every tested method except the alternative vote, the method supported by the Liberal-Democrats during the referendum in May 2011 and, of course, FPTP as actually used.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 134-139 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Electoral Studies |
Volume | 32 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2013 |
Keywords
- Alternative vote
- Borda count
- Condorcet method
- Coombs' method
- Electoral systems
- United Kingdom