The Case of Stated Preferences and Social Well-Being Indices

Shiri Cohen Kaminitz*, Iddan Sonsino

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


This paper provides a real-world test case for how to approach contemporary preference aggregation procedures. We examine the method of using stated preferences (SP) to structure social well-being indices. The method has seen increasing popularity and interest, both in economists’ laboratory research and by governments and international institutions. SP offers a sophisticated aggregation of peoples’ preferences regarding social well-being aspects and, in this way, provides elegant and non-paternalistic techniques for deciding how to weigh and prioritize various potential aspects of social well-being (health, happiness, economic growth, etc.). However, this method also poses difficulties and limitations from broader political and philosophical perspectives. This paper comprehensively charts these difficulties and suggests that SP methods should be complemented with appropriate deliberation procedures. The paper bridges the distinct perspectives of economists and political theorists in order to make SP an attractive instrument in determining policy.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)32-55
Number of pages24
JournalErasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jun 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022


  • aggregation
  • deliberation
  • deliberative democracy
  • stated preferences
  • Well-being index


Dive into the research topics of 'The Case of Stated Preferences and Social Well-Being Indices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this