Abstract
Understanding animal communication requires identifying how signals map onto meaning in the receiver’s perceptual space, yet most studies rely on clustering signals by physical similarity 1 . It is tempting to assume that the physical and the perceptual spaces are highly correlated, but this may not be the case. We exemplify this by examining a form of communication for which we do have some access to the perceptual space — the communication of pre-linguistic human toddlers directed towards adult humans. We use a small data set of vocalizations recorded in three different semantic contexts which could be described as: (1) distress calls; (2) contact calls with a specific recipient (father or mother); or (3) begging calls (emitted in expectation of feeding). Our results show that acoustic similarity does not necessarily correlate with the receiver’s perceptual space.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | R900-R901 |
| Journal | Current Biology |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 16 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 17 Aug 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2026 Elsevier Inc.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The challenge of decoding animal communication using AI'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver