The competition state as a neomercantilist state: Understanding the restructuring of national and global telecommunications

David Levi-Faur*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Scopus citations

Abstract

The old etatist telecommunications order is presently experiencing radical changes, which seems to be deeper and broader than in any other sector. The paper examines the implications of these changes on the economic role of the state. It identifies regulation as an increasingly important mode of government intervention in the economy. The regulatory arsenal that states use to restructure global telecommunications includes new regulation, deregulation, and reregulation. The paper distinguishes two types of regulation aimed at the introduction of competition and the creation of markets: regulation-of-competition and regulation-for-competition. While the first type is a liberal form of intervention which aims to correct 'market creation' by the state. The critical place of regulation-for-competition in the governance of the new telecommunications regime underlines the rise of a 'competition state,' interpreted here as a refined and updated version of the neomercantilist state.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)665-685
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Socio-Economics
Volume27
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The competition state as a neomercantilist state: Understanding the restructuring of national and global telecommunications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this