In this chapter I look at three facets of the discourse of public apologies, namely their modes of realization, interpretation and mediation. First, I show how face considerations in the public arena compel politicians to realize creative forms of apologies in order to minimize their responsibility for misdeeds. Second, I point to patterns of interpretation of public apologies by politicians and audiences. Whereas the public seeks indicators of sincerity in apologetic statements, politicians tend to lay their judgment on various interests - political, economic, and symbolic - that do not necessarily coincide with the linguistic performance of the apology. Third, I demonstrate the active involvement of journalists in constructing social dramas of apology. In conclusion, I argue that, paradoxically, the public context in which apologies are made, renders them liable to be suspected of insincerity while at the same time, enables them to achieve their ends.
|Original language||American English|
|Title of host publication||At the Interface|
|Subtitle of host publication||Probing the Boundaries|
|Publisher||Brill Academic Publishers|
|Number of pages||19|
|State||Published - 2023|
|Name||At the Interface: Probing the Boundaries|
Bibliographical notePublisher Copyright:
© 2023 Brill. All rights reserved.
- avoidance dilemma
- discourse analysis
- public record
- speech acts