Abstract
In several papers, I have argued for a theory of distributive justice and considered its implications. This theory includes a principle of responsibility that was endorsed by others within an account of defensive force (self-defense and defense of others). Whitley Kaufman criticizes this account which he refers to as the "distributive justice theory of self-defense" (DJ theory). In this paper, I respond to this criticism. I argue that Kaufman presents the theory inaccurately, that his standard of evaluation of the theory is inadequate and that his claim that the theory should be rejected is unconvincing.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Ethics & International Affairs |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| State | Published - 6 Aug 2008 |
Keywords
- Distributive Justice
- Self-Defense
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Distributive Justice Theory of Self-Defense: A Response to Whitley Kaufman'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver