TY - JOUR
T1 - The duties of fairness and impartiality in non-judicial justice
AU - Shetreet, Shimon
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - The article suggests that while there are differences between typical judicial justice procedures and the alternative dispute resolution procedures that may require a different application of principles, the core concept remains unchanged. The principles of judicial independence, impartiality, and the value of fairness apply to both with proper adjustments. The article also proposes that in view of the increase in online dispute resolution procedures (ODR), a new approach must be introduced to ensure fairness in online justice, following the model of impartiality and decisional independence that is now accepted for administrative adjudicators. Copy; LexisNexis, 2013.
AB - The article suggests that while there are differences between typical judicial justice procedures and the alternative dispute resolution procedures that may require a different application of principles, the core concept remains unchanged. The principles of judicial independence, impartiality, and the value of fairness apply to both with proper adjustments. The article also proposes that in view of the increase in online dispute resolution procedures (ODR), a new approach must be introduced to ensure fairness in online justice, following the model of impartiality and decisional independence that is now accepted for administrative adjudicators. Copy; LexisNexis, 2013.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927124271&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10192557.2013.11788273
DO - 10.1080/10192557.2013.11788273
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:84927124271
SN - 1019-2557
VL - 21
SP - 197
EP - 222
JO - Asia Pacific Law Review
JF - Asia Pacific Law Review
IS - 2
ER -