TY - JOUR
T1 - The effects of an action's “age-of-acquisition” on action-sentence processing
AU - Gilead, Michael
AU - Liberman, Nira
AU - Maril, Anat
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - How does our brain allow us comprehend abstract/symbolic descriptions of human action? Whereas past research suggested that processing action language relies on sensorimotor brain regions, recent work suggests that sensorimotor activation depends on participants’ task goals, such that focusing on abstract (vs. concrete) aspects of an action activates “default mode network” (rather than sensorimotor) regions. Following a Piagetian framework, we hypothesized that for actions acquired at an age wherein abstract/symbolic cognition is fully-developed, even when participants focus on the concrete aspects of an action, they should retrieve abstract-symbolic mental representations. In two studies, participants processed the concrete (i.e., “how”) and abstract (i.e., “why”) aspects of late-acquired and early-acquired actions. Consistent with previous research, focusing on the abstract (vs. concrete) aspects of an action resulted in greater activation in the “default mode network”. Importantly, the activation in these regions was higher when processing later-acquired (vs. earlier acquired) actions—also when participants’ goal was to focus on the concrete aspects of the action. We discuss the implications of the current findings to research on the involvement of concrete representations in abstract cognition.
AB - How does our brain allow us comprehend abstract/symbolic descriptions of human action? Whereas past research suggested that processing action language relies on sensorimotor brain regions, recent work suggests that sensorimotor activation depends on participants’ task goals, such that focusing on abstract (vs. concrete) aspects of an action activates “default mode network” (rather than sensorimotor) regions. Following a Piagetian framework, we hypothesized that for actions acquired at an age wherein abstract/symbolic cognition is fully-developed, even when participants focus on the concrete aspects of an action, they should retrieve abstract-symbolic mental representations. In two studies, participants processed the concrete (i.e., “how”) and abstract (i.e., “why”) aspects of late-acquired and early-acquired actions. Consistent with previous research, focusing on the abstract (vs. concrete) aspects of an action resulted in greater activation in the “default mode network”. Importantly, the activation in these regions was higher when processing later-acquired (vs. earlier acquired) actions—also when participants’ goal was to focus on the concrete aspects of the action. We discuss the implications of the current findings to research on the involvement of concrete representations in abstract cognition.
KW - Abstract cognition
KW - Action sentence processing
KW - Age of acquisition
KW - Embodied cognition
KW - Social cognition
KW - fMRI
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988431044&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.07.034
DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.07.034
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 27431759
AN - SCOPUS:84988431044
SN - 1053-8119
VL - 141
SP - 341
EP - 349
JO - NeuroImage
JF - NeuroImage
ER -