The Feeling “Without Any Name”

Otniel E. Dror*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this commentary, I briefly present in chronological order several historical developments which can explain some of the confusions with respect to arousal that have become entrenched in the contemporary debate. These historical developments include: Immanuel Kant's eighteenth-century division of the affects into sthenic vs. asthenic; the emergence of modern conceptions of pleasure and displeasure in the West; the nineteenth-century alignment of pleasure and displeasure with “sthenic” and “asthenic” in psycho-physiology; the early-twentieth-century disruption of this nineteenth-century alignment; the establishment of a new-physiological order of emotions; and the emergence of “emotional excitement” as the new feeling of the new emotion order of physiology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)16-18
Number of pages3
JournalEmotion Review
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.

Keywords

  • arousal
  • asthenic
  • displeasure
  • excitement
  • history of emotions
  • physiology of emotions
  • pleasure
  • psychophysiology
  • sthenic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Feeling “Without Any Name”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this