The first condition of progress? Freedom of speech and the limits of international trade law

Tomer Broude, Holger Hestermeyer

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

When economic operators trade internationally, not only goods and services cross national boundaries, but also the culture, opinions, information, and ideas that they carry.2 This creates complex links between the regulation of international trade and international human rights law. Measures that restrict the freedom of speech may concurrently interfere with international trade, while barriers to trade may encroach upon the freedom of expression,3 which under international law applies “regardless of frontiers.” The link between these two regimes is more than theoretical. A WTO complaint brought by the European Union against China in 2008 challenged regulations that required all foreign financial information service providers to act, in essence, through China’s central news agency, Xinhua. While these regulations quite clearly violated international trade agreements, they simultaneously restricted the freedom of expression and access to information. In 2009, a complaint by the USA showed that China had reserved the distribution of films, audiovisual entertainment products, sound recordings and certain publications to state-designated and -owned enterprises - again posing not only a trade problem but also a restriction on the freedom of expression (the Audiovisual Products case). In the same year, a WTO panel ruled partly against China despite its invocation of public order exceptions (the IPR Enforcement case), because its copyright legislation denied protection from works that had not been authorized for public circulation by government censors, suggesting yet another interaction between trade and the freedom of expression. What is striking in these cases is that international trade law and human rights seem to be mutually reinforcing, in contrast to the more familiar narrative in which trade liberalization somehow negates or overrides human rights. The fragmentation of international law is often considered a source of normative and institutional conflict.

Original languageAmerican English
Title of host publicationInternational Economic Law After the Global Crisis
Subtitle of host publicationA Tale of Fragmented Disciplines
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages209-236
Number of pages28
ISBN (Electronic)9781139871853
ISBN (Print)9781107075696
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Cambridge University Press 2015.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The first condition of progress? Freedom of speech and the limits of international trade law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this