Abstract
We define several principles for analyzing the development patterns of the proto-MT, such as the two stages in the life of the proto-MT books, the assumption that there was only a single copy of the proto-MT of each book, and the different textual quality of the scripture books. A guiding principle for our thinking is that the archetype of the proto-MT was not formed at one time. To the assumption that the canonization of the three parts of scripture was gradual, I add the hypothesis that the fixation of the three sections of the archetype of the text (the proto-MT) also took place in stages, together with the fixing of the content.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 306-319 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Hebrew Bible and Ancient Israel |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Appeared also in his collected articles "Studies in Textual Criticism" (2024) 75-84.RAMBI Publications
- Rambi Publications
- Bible -- Criticism, Textual
- Bible -- History
- Masorah
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The formation of the (proto‑)Masoretic text'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver