The idea of semitic monotheism: The rise and fall of a scholarly myth

Guy G. Stroumsa*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Book/ReportBookpeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this work, a sequel to my A New Science: The Discovery of Religion in an Age of Reason (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010), I study some major aspects of the scholarly study of religion in the long nineteenth century-from the Enlightenment to the First World War. More precisely, I seek to understand the new status of Judaism and Islam in the formative period of the new discipline. In order to do that, I focus on the concept of Semitic monotheism, a concept developed by Ernest Renan around the mid-nineteenth century, on the basis of the postulated (and highly problematic) contradistinction between Aryan and Semitic families of peoples, cultures, and religions. This contradistinction grew from the Western discovery of Sanskrit and its relationship with European languages, at the time of the Enlightenment and Romanticism. Together with the rise of scholarly Orientalism, this discovery offered new perspectives on the East, as a consequence of which the Near East was demoted, as it were, from its traditional status as the locus of the biblical revelations. The book essentially studies a central issue in the modern study of religion. Doing so, however, it emphasizes that the new dualistic taxonomy of religions had major consequences and sheds new light on the roots of European attitudes to Jews and Muslims in the twentieth century and up to the present day.

Original languageEnglish
PublisherOxford University Press
Number of pages299
ISBN (Electronic)9780192898685
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Guy G. Stroumsa 2021.

Keywords

  • Anti-semitism
  • Cultural transfers
  • History of religions
  • History of scholarship
  • Monotheism
  • Orientalism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The idea of semitic monotheism: The rise and fall of a scholarly myth'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this