The informational basis of social judgments: Memory for integrated and nonintegrated trait descriptions

Eugene Burnstein*, Yaacov Schul

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

The representation of trait descriptions in memory depends not only on the properties of this information (e.g., whether it is consistent) but also on the operations performed on it (e.g., whether it has been integrated). If a set of traits merely has to be comprehended without being integrated (called a discrete judgment), then an inconsistent set is processed just as readily as a consistent one. However, if integration is required, that is, a coherent impression must be formed (called an integrative judgment), consistent trait descriptions are processed more rapidly than inconsistent ones. The effect of such differences in processing on the representation was shown in recognition memory performance: First, following integrative judgment a trait description was more accessible than following a discrete judgment. Second, under integrative judgment, memory for a consistent trait description was no greater than that for an inconsistent description, whereas under discrete judgment, memory for the former was superior to that for the latter. This suggests that when an impression is formed, namely, under integrative judgment, the traits describing a person are associated with each other via prior knowledge, and thus are represented as a unified structure; otherwise each trait is stored as a separate piece of information.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)49-57
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1983
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The informational basis of social judgments: Memory for integrated and nonintegrated trait descriptions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this