The limits of universal rule: Eurasian empires compared

Yuri Pines (Editor), Michal Biran (Editor), Jörg Rüpke (Editor)

Research output: Book/ReportBook


All major continental empires proclaimed their desire to rule 'the entire world', investing considerable human and material resources in expanding their territory. Each, however, eventually had to stop expansion and come to terms with a shift to defensive strategy. This volume explores the factors that facilitated Eurasian empires' expansion and contraction: from ideology to ecology, economic and military considerations to changing composition of the imperial elites. Built around a common set of questions, a team of leading specialists systematically compare a broad set of Eurasian empires - from Achaemenid Iran, the Romans, Qin and Han China, via the Caliphate, the Byzantines and the Mongols to the Ottomans, Safavids, Mughals, Russians, and Ming and Qing China. The result is a state-of-the art analysis of the major imperial enterprises in Eurasian history from antiquity to the early modern that discerns both commonalities and differences in the empires' spatial trajectories.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationCambridge; New York, NY
PublisherCambridge University Press
Number of pages397
ISBN (Electronic)1108771068, 1108806635, 1108808743
ISBN (Print)1108488633, 9781108488631
StatePublished - 2021

Bibliographical note

Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 11 Jan 2021).


Dive into the research topics of 'The limits of universal rule: Eurasian empires compared'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this