TY - JOUR
T1 - The meaning of multicultural evaluation and meaningful evaluation
T2 - the importance of multifaceted responsive evaluation in higher education
AU - Soffer-Vital, Shira
AU - Finkelstein, Idit
AU - Shraga-Roitman, Yael
AU - Cohen-Liverant, Revital
AU - Grebelsky-Lichtman, Tsfira
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - The interplay between evaluation, pedagogy, and curriculum has been researched extensively. But evaluation is often treated as an isolated component in academic settings, also neglecting multicultural aspects. Its purpose is to measure students’ achievements at the end of the course and function as distinctive criteria between high-achieving and low-achieving students. However, according to the constructivist approach, evaluation is embedded in the planning of curricula and pedagogical processes. Specifically, the content this article seeks to measure depends on the curriculum and the pedagogical processes. Not only is evaluation affected by these two components, but it also affects them. Therefore, all three components must be aligned and defined by the same goals and strengths. When these components are not aligned as is necessary, the educational process could be affected negatively. However, many variables are not considered nowadays, such as student gender, multiculturalism disabilities, and technological literacy. This article addresses this gap, discussing the implications of neglecting these variables.
AB - The interplay between evaluation, pedagogy, and curriculum has been researched extensively. But evaluation is often treated as an isolated component in academic settings, also neglecting multicultural aspects. Its purpose is to measure students’ achievements at the end of the course and function as distinctive criteria between high-achieving and low-achieving students. However, according to the constructivist approach, evaluation is embedded in the planning of curricula and pedagogical processes. Specifically, the content this article seeks to measure depends on the curriculum and the pedagogical processes. Not only is evaluation affected by these two components, but it also affects them. Therefore, all three components must be aligned and defined by the same goals and strengths. When these components are not aligned as is necessary, the educational process could be affected negatively. However, many variables are not considered nowadays, such as student gender, multiculturalism disabilities, and technological literacy. This article addresses this gap, discussing the implications of neglecting these variables.
KW - CRE (Culturally Relevant Evaluation)
KW - Israel
KW - curriculum
KW - evaluation
KW - multiculturalism
KW - pedagogy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85174821816&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13537121.2023.2269737
DO - 10.1080/13537121.2023.2269737
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85174821816
SN - 1353-7121
VL - 29
SP - 1167
EP - 1180
JO - Israel Affairs
JF - Israel Affairs
IS - 6
ER -