Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Metaethical Presuppositions of Conceptual Engineering

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

Abstract

Conceptual engineering is the project of adding, improving, or removing concepts from our conceptual frameworks. Conceptual amelioration, in particular, purports to improve the conception or extension of a given concept for some epistemic, moral, or political purpose. While recent work has explored the nature and possibility of conceptual amelioration as a methodology, little attention has been given to its metaethical presuppositions. This chapter begins to fill that gap by connecting the metasemantic questions with the metanormative ones. The normative considerations of conceptual engineering are more deeply entwined with metaethics than other normative domains because of conceptual ethics’ murky relationship to metasemantic theory more generally. Ultimately, this chapter argues that the possibility of many instances of conceptual engineering depends on normative truths that are intersubjectively shared -a relationship here called Normative Metasemantic Entanglement.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationOxford Studies in Metaethics
Subtitle of host publicationVolume 20
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages118-147
Number of pages30
Volume20
ISBN (Electronic)9780198958109
ISBN (Print)9780198958079
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© the several contributors 2025.

Keywords

  • concepts
  • conceptual engineering
  • metaethics
  • metasemantics
  • political change

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Metaethical Presuppositions of Conceptual Engineering'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this