TY - JOUR
T1 - The Microbiology Characteristics of Infected Branchial Cleft Anomalies
AU - Hirshoren, Nir
AU - Fried, Neta
AU - Weinberger, Jeffrey M.
AU - Eliashar, Ron
AU - Korem, Maya
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Authors 2019.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Objectives: To investigate the microbiology profile of infected branchial cleft anomalies compared to deep neck infection and explore the influence of age on culture findings. Study Design: A retrospective case control study. Setting: A single tertiary medical center. Subjects and Methods: Patients treated for branchial cleft anomalies between 2006 and 2016 were included. Demographic data, disease and treatment parameters, and microbiology profile, including bacteria classification, antibiotics resistance patterns, and number of pathogens, were analyzed. Results: Of 278 cases treated for branchial cleft anomalies, we have analyzed 69 cases with infection and pathogen identification. The proportion of monobacterial infections was higher (70.6% vs 44.3%; P =.003; odds ratio [OR], 3.02) and the proportion of Streptococcus species infection was lower (48.9% vs 77.2%; P =.001; OR, 0.282) among the infected branchial cleft cases compared to deep neck infections. Anaerobic bacteria infection did not differ between groups (17.8% and 16.5%, respectively). There was a nonsignificant tendency toward more resistant bacterial strains among the infected branchial clefts (15.6% vs 6.3%; P =.118; OR, 2.726). There was no difference between the bacterial profile of patients younger or older than 16 years. Conclusions: The microbiology profile of infected branchial cleft anomalies is not age related and is different from that of deep neck infections. We demonstrate a relatively high frequency of monobacterial infections, relatively lower streptococcal infection rates, and a substantial contribution by resistant species and anaerobes. Empiric antibiotic treatment should cover Streptococcus species, including penicillin-resistant species, as well as clindamycin-resistant anaerobes.
AB - Objectives: To investigate the microbiology profile of infected branchial cleft anomalies compared to deep neck infection and explore the influence of age on culture findings. Study Design: A retrospective case control study. Setting: A single tertiary medical center. Subjects and Methods: Patients treated for branchial cleft anomalies between 2006 and 2016 were included. Demographic data, disease and treatment parameters, and microbiology profile, including bacteria classification, antibiotics resistance patterns, and number of pathogens, were analyzed. Results: Of 278 cases treated for branchial cleft anomalies, we have analyzed 69 cases with infection and pathogen identification. The proportion of monobacterial infections was higher (70.6% vs 44.3%; P =.003; odds ratio [OR], 3.02) and the proportion of Streptococcus species infection was lower (48.9% vs 77.2%; P =.001; OR, 0.282) among the infected branchial cleft cases compared to deep neck infections. Anaerobic bacteria infection did not differ between groups (17.8% and 16.5%, respectively). There was a nonsignificant tendency toward more resistant bacterial strains among the infected branchial clefts (15.6% vs 6.3%; P =.118; OR, 2.726). There was no difference between the bacterial profile of patients younger or older than 16 years. Conclusions: The microbiology profile of infected branchial cleft anomalies is not age related and is different from that of deep neck infections. We demonstrate a relatively high frequency of monobacterial infections, relatively lower streptococcal infection rates, and a substantial contribution by resistant species and anaerobes. Empiric antibiotic treatment should cover Streptococcus species, including penicillin-resistant species, as well as clindamycin-resistant anaerobes.
KW - anaerobic bacteria
KW - antibiotics resistance
KW - branchial cleft anomalies
KW - deep neck infection
KW - microbiology profile
KW - polymicrobial infection
KW - streptococcal infection
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099082060&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/2473974X19861065
DO - 10.1177/2473974X19861065
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85099082060
SN - 2473-974X
VL - 3
JO - OTO Open
JF - OTO Open
IS - 3
ER -