Abstract
How do the aesthetic attributes of digital interfaces affect users’ ability to respond morally to the witnessing of suffering? Focusing on mainstream Graphical User Interfaces (GUI), this article proposes a phenomenology of user experience centred on the moral obligations of attending to, engaging with and acting upon digitized Holocaust survivor testimonies. The GUI, it argues, produces a regimen of eye–hand–screen relations that oscillates between ‘operative’ and ‘hermeneutic’ modes of embodied attention, creating a default condition of bodily restlessness that threatens prolonged, empathetic encounters with depicted others. Nevertheless, interface attributes of real-time screen interaction, haptic sensuousness and user-indexicality enable moral engagement with the witness-survivor, while translating information-sharing into the moral action of co-witnessing. These attributes enable an ‘ethics of kinaesthetics’ that converts sensorimotor responsiveness into moral responsibility. Digital interfaces have established a historically novel situation, where moral response to distant suffering depends on the smallest movements of our fingers and eyes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 351-368 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | New Media and Society |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2018 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2016, © The Author(s) 2016.
Keywords
- Aesthetics
- Holocaust testimony
- attention
- embodiment
- ethics
- haptic
- indexical
- interface
- moral response
- witnessing
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The mouse, the screen and the Holocaust witness: Interface aesthetics and moral response'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver