The need for explicit argumentation in ethical decision-making in social work

Rujla Osmo, Ruth Landau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article addresses the need for social workers' explicit argumentation in ethical decision-making, i.e. the justification offered in adopting a particular course of action with their clients. It is the main assumption of this article that social workers need to be aware and explicit of the personal and professional ideas, concepts, values, and assumptions that guide their practice. In the following sections we clarify central concepts such as argumentation and its explicitness, present a conceptual framework for analyzing ethical decisions in social work, illustrate its applicability on social work dilemmas, and discuss possible implications for social work practice and education. Finally, we recommend that social work education put emphasis on: (1) developing more awareness for inner deliberations and making these explicit and amenable for evaluation; and (2) developing specific skills for explicit argumentation in ethical decision-making.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)483-492
Number of pages10
JournalSocial Work Education
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2001

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The need for explicit argumentation in ethical decision-making in social work'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this