“The Only Actual Theology of the Whole Torah”: Rosenzweig on the Divine Name, the Divine Attributes, and the Space of Redemption

Benjamin Pollock*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

To explain what Rosenzweig means when he identifies Exodus 33–34 as “the only actual theology of the whole Torah,” I undertake a close reading of Rosenzweig’s comments on Exodus 33–34 in the Working Papers (Arbeitspapiere) and compare them with his parallel discussion of Exodus 3:14 with Buber. I argue that if we are to make sense of the way Rosenzweig would have us understand the relationship between worldly space, the divine name, and the divine attributes, we must revisit his early formulations of his notion of revelation as orientation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)232-279
Number of pages48
JournalJournal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Benjamin Pollock, 2025.

Keywords

  • Bible translation
  • Franz Rosenzweig
  • Martin Buber
  • Tetragrammaton
  • Zimzum
  • divine attributes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“The Only Actual Theology of the Whole Torah”: Rosenzweig on the Divine Name, the Divine Attributes, and the Space of Redemption'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this